Computer Law

Computer Law and Computer Crimes Lawyer in Tampa, Florida

In Tampa, Florida, having a Computer Law and Computer Crimes Lawyer is of paramount importance in today’s digitally driven landscape. These specialized attorneys are equipped to handle legal matters related to technology, data privacy, and cybercrimes. They play a crucial role in assisting individuals and businesses in navigating the complex web of computer laws and regulations.

A Computer Law and Computer Crimes Lawyer in Tampa offers expertise in areas such as intellectual property protection, cybersecurity, data breaches, and digital compliance. They help clients understand their rights and responsibilities in the digital realm, ensuring that they are well-prepared to defend against cybercrimes or pursue legal action when necessary.

With the ever-growing reliance on technology, having a knowledgeable advocate in the field of computer law in Tampa, Florida, is not just an advantage but a necessity for safeguarding one’s digital assets and privacy in an increasingly interconnected world.

crimes computer Tampa Florida Computer Crimes Attorney/Lawyer


Protecting Your Digital World

In an age of digital transformation, the importance of computer law and a computer crimes lawyer cannot be overstated. Our Tampa, Florida-based attorney specializes in defending individuals and businesses against cybercrimes.


Experienced Legal Team

Our attorney has a deep understanding of computer law and is backed by one of the world’s most advanced computer forensic teams. We bring unmatched expertise to safeguard your digital assets and protect your rights.


Comprehensive Legal Services

Whether you’re dealing with data breaches, online fraud, intellectual property disputes, or any computer-related legal issue, our computer crimes lawyer is here to provide the legal guidance and representation you need.

 

crimes computer Tampa Florida Computer Crimes Attorney/Lawyer

 


Computer Civil Litigation Computer Crimes

Computer Civil Litigation and Computer Crimes are integral components of modern legal practice. Computer Civil Litigation involves legal disputes arising from technology-related issues, encompassing contract breaches, intellectual property disputes, and data privacy violations. It necessitates lawyers with a deep understanding of technology and digital evidence to effectively represent clients.

On the flip side, Computer Crimes involve prosecuting or defending against illegal activities facilitated by computers or the internet. This includes cyberattacks, identity theft, and online fraud. Lawyers specializing in Computer Crimes must stay abreast of evolving cyber threats and digital forensics to combat these offenses.

Together, Computer Civil Litigation and Computer Crimes underscore the growing significance of technology in today’s society. Legal professionals versed in these domains are essential for safeguarding individuals and organizations in an increasingly digital and interconnected world. Their expertise ensures justice in the digital realm and the protection of rights and assets.


Computer Forensics

Computer Forensics is a specialized field within digital investigation that plays a crucial role in solving cybercrimes and uncovering digital evidence for legal purposes. It involves the meticulous examination of digital devices, such as computers, smartphones, and servers, to extract, analyze, and preserve electronic data. Computer Forensic experts use advanced techniques and tools to trace the digital footprints left behind by cybercriminals, recover deleted files, and authenticate electronic evidence.

In today’s technology-driven world, Computer Forensics is invaluable for law enforcement, legal professionals, and organizations. It aids in solving various crimes, from cyberattacks and data breaches to financial fraud and intellectual property theft. It also ensures the integrity of evidence presented in court, facilitating fair trials and the pursuit of justice. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, Computer Forensics remains an essential tool in the fight against cybercrime and the protection of digital assets and privacy.


Intellectual Property Theft

Intellectual Property Theft, often referred to as IP theft, is a grave violation of creators’ and innovators’ rights. It encompasses the unauthorized use, reproduction, or distribution of intellectual property, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. IP theft can occur in various forms, such as counterfeiting products, plagiarism, software piracy, and corporate espionage.

The consequences of IP theft are far-reaching. It undermines innovation and creativity by discouraging investment in research and development. Businesses suffer financial losses, damaged reputations, and a competitive disadvantage. Moreover, it hampers economic growth and job creation. To combat IP theft, legal systems worldwide provide mechanisms for protecting intellectual property rights, and organizations implement security measures and employee training to safeguard their valuable assets. Vigilance against IP theft is crucial in today’s knowledge-driven economy to foster innovation, protect creators, and maintain a fair marketplace.


Unlawful Access to Networks and/or Data

Unlawful access to networks and/or data, commonly known as hacking, is a serious and pervasive cybercrime in the digital age. It involves unauthorized entry into computer systems, networks, or databases with the intent to steal, manipulate, or compromise sensitive information. These malicious activities can lead to significant harm, including data breaches, financial theft, privacy violations, and even national security threats.

Hackers employ various techniques, from exploiting software vulnerabilities to using phishing schemes, to gain illicit access. Their motivations vary, ranging from financial gain to espionage or ideological purposes. Unlawful access to networks and data poses a substantial risk to individuals, organizations, and governments worldwide.

Preventing such cybercrimes necessitates robust cybersecurity measures, including firewalls, encryption, and employee training on recognizing and mitigating security threats. Legal frameworks and law enforcement efforts are also essential in prosecuting hackers and deterring future unlawful access attempts. In a digitally interconnected world, safeguarding against unauthorized access is crucial for protecting sensitive information and upholding the security and trust of digital ecosystems.

crimes computer Tampa Florida Computer Crimes Attorney/Lawyer

Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Update | Cut, Copy, and Paste Not Florida Porn Violation

child pornography, cyber, cybercrime,

Child Pornography, Cybercrime,

Cut, Copy, and Paste

“The images . . . are composite images which were crudely prepared by cutting and pasting a photocopy of the head of a minor onto a photocopy of an adult female.”

Cut, Copy, and Paste Not Florida Porn Violation


“child pornography has been defined in the federal statutes to specifically include composite images.” See 18 U.S.C. § 2256(8)(C) (2008).”
Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney reports a decision of the Florida Court of Appeal where, “composite images which were crudely prepared by cutting and pasting a photocopy of the head of a minor onto a photocopy of an adult female.” do not constitute violation of the Florida Statutes. Section 827.071(5) proscribes the possession of child pornography, in pertinent part, as follows: It is unlawful for any person to knowingly possess a photograph, motion picture, exhibition, show, representation, or other presentation which, in whole or in part, he or she knows to include any sexual conduct by a child. The possession of each such photograph, motion picture, exhibition, show, representation, or presentation is a separate offense.

“The images . . . are composite images which were crudely prepared by cutting and pasting a photocopy of the head of a minor onto a photocopy of an adult female.”


The court ruled “If the legislature had intended to proscribe the possession of composite images that simulate lewd and lascivious exhibition of the genitals, it could have included a provision doing so.  In fact, child pornography has been defined in the federal statutes to specifically include composite images.” See 18 U.S.C. § 2256(8)(C) (2008).

 

The Tribune reports, “The U.S. Supreme Court in 2002 overturned a federal law that made computer-simulated child pornography illegal. The high court ruled that because the computer-generated depictions were not the product of the actual sexual abuse of children they were protected by the First Amendment.”
 
You can call Casey at 1-877-793-9290 for a free phone consultation.
.
Sources: https://www.2dca.org/opinions/Opinion_Pages/Opinion_Page_2010/December/dec0310.shtml

https://www2.tbo.com/content/2010/dec/03/031558/child-porn-conviction-of-ex-polk-principal-overtur/news-breaking/

CHAB6000 POSSESSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY

 Possession of Child Pornography, Cybercrime, Cyber, 827.071.5, CHAB6000

Possession of Child Pornography, Cybercrime, Cyber, 827.071.5, CHAB6000

Possession of Child Pornography

Possession of Child Pornography


If you have been charged with CHAB6000 POSSESSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY you can call a Tampa Criminal Defense Lawyer at 1-877-793-9290 and tell me your story.


Form Code: CHAB6000


Florida Statute: 827.071.5
Level: Fel (Felony)
Degree: 3rd
Description: POSSESSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY

CHAB6000 POSSESSION OF CHILD PORNOGRAPHY is often charged in Hillsborough County, Florida.


 

Title XLVI CRIMES
Chapter 827 ABUSE OF CHILDREN


827.071 Sexual performance by a child; penalties.

(5) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly possess a photograph, motion picture, exhibition, show, representation, or other presentation which, in whole or in part, he or she knows to include any sexual conduct by a child. The possession of each such photograph, motion picture, exhibition, show, representation, or presentation is a separate offense. Whoever violates this subsection is guilty of a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

Tampa Federal Criminal Defense Attorney on eMail and Subpoenas

crimes computer Tampa Florida Computer Crimes Attorney/Lawyer Tampa Federal Criminal Defense Attorney on eMail and Subpoenas

Tampa Federal Criminal Defense Attorney on eMail and Subpoenas

Tampa Federal Criminal Defense Attorney notes that one court just held a Search Warrant for eMail was unnecessary, where a federal subpoena was issued. The federal Judge ruled that an Internet Service Provider must comply with the Government subpoena for E-Mail. In this cybercrime prosecution, the Government had subpoenaed the Internet service provider (ISP) and sought the contents of electronic communications. The subpoena requested previously opened or sent e-mail that belonged to the defendant.

The ISP failed to produce e-mails that had been stored for fewer than 181 days, the Government filed a motion to compel production of the e-mails’ content. The ISP claimed the information sought required a search warrant. The Court ruled that the Stored Communications Act (SCA), required the ISP to comply with the Government’s subpoena if the e-mails are held or maintained solely to provide the customer storage or computer processing services.

The court further ruled that previously opened e-mails stored by the ISP for web-based e-mail systems—as distinguished from other e-mail systems—are not in “electronic storage,” which is defined by the Wiretap Act as storage incidental to electronic transmission and for the purposes of backup protection of the e-mail. Based on this finding, the court ordered the ISP to comply fully with the Government’s subpoena.

When Federal Subpoenas are issued, we can help. Tell me your story Toll Free 1-877-793-9290 .

Tampa Federal Criminal Defense Attorney Subpoena eMail

Source: United States v. Weaver, 2009 WL 2163478 (C.D. Ill. July 15, 2009).

Tampa Federal Criminal Defense Attorney on Juror Misconduct

Tampa Federal Criminal Defense Attorney on Juror Misconduct crimes computer Tampa Florida Computer Crimes Attorney/Lawyer

Juror Misconduct

 

Tampa Federal Criminal Defense Attorney W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary, Jr. , notes that the New York Times has uncovered a rash of mistrials resulting from jurors using technology during voir dire (jury selection) and throughout the trial and deliberations.

During a federal drug trial in Florida a juror admitted that he had been doing research on the case on the Internet The judge had instructed the jury not to rely on evidence not presented in court. The other eight jurors had been doing the same thing. The judge declared a mistrial- pulling the plug on an eight-week trial.

Tampa Federal Criminal Defense Attorney on Juror Misconduct