Child Porn Defense Attorneys | Restitution Issues

 Possession of Child Pornography, federal criminal defense, restitution, Child Porn Defense Attorneys

Child Porn Restitution Issues


Child Porn Restitution Issues


Tampa Criminal Defense expert notes a contact with a senior attorney with a large federal criminal defense team who has reported “serious attempts to get restitution for the child victims of the photos.”  Recently, a restitution order in excess of $3,600,000 was ordered against a defendant in a Southern District of Florida . An appeal has been filed and 11th Circuit has set the case for December 2010. The restitution is sought by an  attorney representing the children portrayed in the contraband seized by the feds, the “Amy” series and the “Vicky” series.

In
Tampa last year, 2009, the Government and Probation agreed that, in a possession of child pornography case, restitution for Vicky was not appropriate “because the harm to the victim was not proximately caused by the defendant.”  That case is U.S. v. XXX, Case No. 8:09-cr-00189-T-27MAP. (Name omitted).
 
If you have issues or questions about this sweeping federal law, call me toll free at 1-877-793-9290.
Source: Senior Criminal Defense Attorney in the Middle District of Florida
 
Child Porn Defense Attorneys

Destruction and Spoliation of Evidence | Sanctions

“The sanctions: Defendant to be imprisoned for up to two years, or
until he paid the attorneys’ fees and costs estimated to be a “significant amount.”

Spoliation of Evidence, ESI, destruction of evidence, Electronically Stored Information,

Spoliation of Evidence

Spoliation

Spoliation of Evidence in Cybercrimes


Florida Cybercrime  Attorney has been researching sanctions for destruction of evidence, also known as Spoliation. The Sanctions: Defendant to Pay Attorneys’ Fees or Serve Two Years Imprisonment for “Egregious” Discovery Misconduct.

 


The plaintiff sought sanctions arising out of the defendants’ intentional spoliation of evidence and other litigation misconduct in this intellectual property litigation. There were eight preservation issues including: use of wiping software; failure to implement litigation hold; failure to preserve an external hard drive; failure to preserve files and e-mails notwithstanding plaintiff’s demands and several court orders.

 


The Judge found through four years of discovery, the defendant had actual knowledge of his duty to preserve, “yet delayed and misrepresented the completeness of the ESI [Electronically Stored Information] production and deleted, destroyed and otherwise failed to preserve evidence.” The Judge then found the destruction “collectively constitute[d] the single most egregious example of spoliation [that he has] encountered in any case & in nearly fourteen years on the bench.”

The sanctions: Defendant to be imprisoned for up to two years, or until he paid the attorneys’ fees and costs estimated to be a “significant amount.”

Sources:

Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc., 2010 WL 3703696 (D. Md. Sept. 9, 2010)
https://www.krollontrack.com/newsletters/clu-102010/CLU-102010-decisions.html ?news=US_CaseLaw_Oct_10-a&#D1

Federal Prisoner Handbook | Free Download

Residential Drug Abuse Treatment, RDAP, Bureau of Prisons, Drug Abuse Treatment, Federal Criminal Defense Attorney, Drug Treatment,

Residential Drug Abuse Treatment, RDAP, Bureau of Prisons, Drug Abuse Treatment, Federal Criminal Defense Attorney, Drug Treatment,

Prison Handbook | RDAP

Residential Drug Abuse Treatment


Federal Criminal Defense Attorney, Lawyer W.F. “Casey” Ebsary, Jr.  was researching Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Programs (RDAP). During this project I found a document that I will call a Prisoner Handbook. In it it discusses rules, regulations and procedures for inmates in federal custody. Although the manual was drafted for a Northern prison, it gives insight into what to expect while incarcerated. The manual also discusses the Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Program and its requirements:

“1. Residential drug abuse programming is available at selected Bureau of Prisons institutions. It is a course of individual and group programs provided by a team of Drug Treatment Specialists and the Drug Abuse Program Coordinator in a treatment unit set apart from the general population. 2. The RDAP runs a minimum of 500 hours over a nine to twelve month period depending on individual progression.”

The Handbook is actually titled “Admission &; Orientation Federal Prison Camp.” The Introduction to the handbook begins, “The Purpose of the Admissions and Orientation (A&O) Booklet is to acquaint you with the rules, expectations, and opportunities at the Federal Prison Camp. . . .The Purpose of the Admissions and Orientation (A&O) Booklet is to acquaint you with the rules, expectations, and opportunities at the Federal Prison Camp . . . .”


The manual has several pages about drug treatment and Drug Abuse Programming, noting that the RDAP Involves Three (3) Levels:

1. Drug Education Program: 10 – 15 hours course which is offered at this facility.
2. Non-residential drug treatment: Involves individual as well as group programming, also available at this facility.

3. RDAP: This is a residential drug abuse program which spans approximately nine to twelve months in duration.


Drug Treatment Questions? Call Me Toll Free 1-877-793-9290

Automobile Glovebox Search Thrown Out

Automobile Search, glove box, Search and Seizure

Automobile Search, glove box, Search and Seizure

Search Seizure Automobile

Weapons Found in Car Suppressed


“movements towards the glove box did not justify a search based on officer safety”


 

Florida Defense Attorney just received news of a Automobile Search and Seizure case where the defendant fled from police. The vehicle came to rest. The cop watched the defendant reaching towards the dashboard on the passenger side. Police ordered the defendant to show his hands and step out of the car.

 
The suspect was handcuffed the cops found no weapons on him. Other officers took custody of the defendant. The defendant was separated from his car, in handcuffs, under the supervision of backup officers. The traffic stop cop then seized defendant’s car keys, unlocked the glove box, and found a firearm. The Second District Court ruled that the defendant’s furtive movements towards the glove box did not justify a search based on officer safety. The court held that the law enforcement officer (LEO) could not have reasonably believed that he would find evidence of the defendant s fleeing and eluding in the glove box. Under Arizona v. Gant, the firearm must be suppressed. The case is attached and the firearm statute is below.


Automobile Searched? Tell me about it Toll Free 1-877-793-9290 .


 

 
790.23 Felons and delinquents; possession of firearms, ammunition, or electric weapons or devices unlawful.
 
(1) It is unlawful for any person to own or to have in his or her care, custody, possession, or control any firearm, ammunition, or electric weapon or device, or to carry a concealed weapon, including a tear gas gun or chemical weapon or device, if that person has been:
 
(a) Convicted of a felony in the courts of this state;
 
(b) Found, in the courts of this state, to have committed a delinquent act that would be a felony if committed by an adult and such person is under 24 years of age;
 
(c) Convicted of or found to have committed a crime against the United States which is designated as a felony;
 
(d) Found to have committed a delinquent act in another state, territory, or country that would be a felony if committed by an adult and which was punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year and such person is under 24 years of age; or
 
(e) Found guilty of an offense that is a felony in another state, territory, or country and which was punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year.
 
Source: 35 Fla. L. Weekly D533b (Fla. 2d DCA March 5, 2010) Special Thanks to Rocky Brancato, Associate Attorney Office of the Public Defender 

Resisting Officer Without Violence

Resisting Arrest Without Violence, 843.02, Resisting officer without violence to his or her person, Resisting Officer Without Violence,

Resisting Arrest Without Violence

843.02 Resisting officer without
violence to his or her person

Resisting Arrest Without Violence


Tampa Florida Criminal Defense Attorney was just reviewing a case of Resisting an Officer Without Violence.  The defendant gave a false name and date of birth DOB  to a cop. The court ruled that was insufficient to support a conviction since the defendant was not under arrest nor was the defendant being lawfully detained when he provided the false information. The defendant should have been acquitted, so says the appeals court. Motion for judgment of acquittal.(JOA) granted.

Resisting or Not? Call me for a Free Phone Consultation 1-877-793-9290 .


843.02 Resisting officer without violence to his or her person.

Whoever shall resist, obstruct, or oppose any officer as defined in s. 943.10(1), (2), (3), (6), (7), (8), or (9); member of the Parole Commission or any administrative aide or supervisor employed by the commission; county probation officer; parole and probation supervisor; personnel or representative of the Department of Law Enforcement; or other person legally authorized to execute process in the execution of legal process or in the lawful execution of any legal duty, without offering or doing violence to the person of the officer, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

Source: 35 Fla. L. Weekly D368a



BATT1001 BATTERY (VICTIM OVER 65)

Victim Over 65 Battery, BATTERY (VICTIM OVER 65), BATT1001, 784.03.1A

Victim Over 65 Battery, BATTERY (VICTIM OVER 65), BATT1001, 784.03.1A

Victim Over 65 Battery

If you have been charged with BATT1001 BATTERY (VICTIM OVER 65) you can call a Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney for FREE at 1-813-222-2220  and tell me your story.


Form Code: BATT1001


Florida Statute: 784.03.1A
Level: Fel (Felony)
Degree: 3rd
Description: BATTERY (VICTIM OVER 65)

BATT1001 BATTERY (VICTIM OVER 65) is often charged in Hillsborough County, Florida.

 

Title XLVI CRIMES
Chapter 784 ASSAULT; BATTERY; CULPABLE NEGLIGENCE


784.03 Battery; felony battery.

(1)(a) The offense of battery occurs when a person:
1. Actually and intentionally touches or strikes another person against the will of the other; or
2. Intentionally causes bodily harm to another person.

BATT1006 BATTERY SECOND OR SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE

Battery Second Offense, BATT1006, 784.03.2, BATTERY SECOND OR SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE

Battery Second Offense

Battery Second Offense

If you were not represented the first time, DO NOT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE.

If you have been charged with BATT1006 BATTERY SECOND OR SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE you can call a Tampa Criminal Defense Lawyer NOW FOR FREE at 1-877-793-9290 and tell me your story.


Form Code: BATT1006


Florida Statute: 784.03.2
Level: Level: Fel (Felony)
Degree: 3rd

Description: BATTERY SECOND OR SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE

 

BATT1006 BATTERY SECOND OR SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE is often charged in Hillsborough County, Florida.

 

Title XLVI CRIMES
Chapter 784 ASSAULT; BATTERY; CULPABLE NEGLIGENCE


784.03 Battery; felony battery.

(2) A person who has one prior conviction for battery, aggravated battery, or felony battery and who commits any second or subsequent battery commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. For purposes of this subsection, “conviction” means a determination of guilt that is the result of a plea or a trial, regardless of whether adjudication is withheld or a plea of nolo contendere is entered.

BATT1007 BATTERY (SECOND OR SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE) DV

Battery Domestic Violence Felony

Felony Battery Domestic Violence

Battery Domestic Violence Felony

“intentionally touches or strikes another person against the will of the other . . .  person who has one prior conviction for battery”


Felony Battery Domestic Violence


If you have been charged with BATT1007 BATTERY (SECOND OR SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE) DV you can call a Battery Defense Attorney in Tampa for FREE at 813-222-2220.


Form Code: BATT1007
Florida Statute: 784.03.2
Level: Level: Fel (Felony)
Degree: 3rd

Description: BATTERY (SECOND OR SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE) DV

BATT1007 BATTERY (SECOND OR SUBSEQUENT OFFENSE) DV is often charged in Hillsborough County, Florida.


Title XLVI CRIMES
Chapter 784 ASSAULT; BATTERY; CULPABLE NEGLIGENCE


784.03 Battery; felony battery.

(1)(a) The offense of battery occurs when a person:
1. Actually and intentionally touches or strikes another person against the will of the other; or
2. Intentionally causes bodily harm to another person.


(2) A person who has one prior conviction for battery, aggravated battery, or felony battery and who commits any second or subsequent battery commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. For purposes of this subsection, “conviction” means a determination of guilt that is the result of a plea or a trial, regardless of whether adjudication is withheld or a plea of nolo contendere is entered.

ASSA5050 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT ON LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER

Aggravated Assault on LEO, 784.021.1A, ASSA5050,  AGGRAVATED ASSAULT ON LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER

Aggravated Assault on LEO, 784.021.1A, ASSA5050

Aggravated Assault on LEO

“aggravated assault is an assault with a deadly weapon without intent to kill”


If you have been charged with ASSA5050 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT ON LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER you can call an Aggravated Assault  Criminal Defense Lawyer in Tampa  at 813-222-2220  and tell your story.


Form Code: ASSA5050
Florida Statute: 784.021.1A
Level: Fel (Felony)
Degree: 2nd


Description: AGGRAVATED ASSAULT ON LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER

ASSA5050 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT ON LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER is often charged in Hillsborough County, Florida.

Title XLVI CRIMES
Chapter 784 ASSAULT; BATTERY; CULPABLE NEGLIGENCE




784.021 Aggravated assault.

(1) An “aggravated assault” is an assault:

(a) With a deadly weapon without intent to kill

ASSA1010 ASSAULT ON A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER

Assault on LEO Law Enforcement Officer, 784.011, ASSA1010, ASSAULT ON A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER

Assault on Law Enforcement Officer, 784.011, ASSA1010

Assault on LEO
Law Enforcement Officer

“assault” is an intentional, unlawful threat by word or act to do violence to the person of another


Assault on Law Enforcement Officer


 

If you have been charged with ASSA1010 ASSAULT ON A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER you can call a Tampa Assault Defense Attorney at 813-222-2220 and tell me your story.


Form Code: ASSA1010

 Florida Statute: 784.011
Level: Misd (Misdemeanor)
Degree: 1st
Description: ASSAULT ON A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER

ASSA1010 ASSAULT ON A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER is often charged in Hillsborough County, Florida.
Title XLVI CRIMES
Chapter 784 ASSAULT; BATTERY; CULPABLE NEGLIGENCE

 

784.011 Assault.
(1) An “assault” is an intentional, unlawful threat by word or act to do violence to the person of another, coupled with an apparent ability to do so, and doing some act which creates a well-founded fear in such other person that such violence is imminent.
(2) Whoever commits an assault shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.