Open WiFi Port Gets A Visit From Feds

cybercrime, Child Porn, Computer Investigations, computer forensic, child pornography, Child Porn Defense Attorneys

Cybercrime, Child Porn, Computer Investigations

Wi Fi Bust

Florida Computer Crime Defense Attorney / Lawyer notes a Florida guy got a visit from the Feds, after a long distance wireless antenna was used to access his network on the 12th Floor of a Tampa Bay area condominium. The guy the Feds eventually busted was on a boat in the bay and was eventually indicted.

This Tampa Bay story has become national news. 

Call me Toll Free 1-877-793-9290 if you or a loved one have questions.

Gun and Drug Evidence Suppressed

Firearm, Gun, Pat Down, Search and Seizure, Reasonable Suspicion

Firearm, Gun, Pat Down, Search and Seizure, Reasonable Suspicion

Gun Suppressed

Gun and Drugs were Thrown out after an Illegal Pat Down / Search


Tampa Defense Attorney recently studied a court ruling where a gun and drugs were thrown out after an illegal pat down was ruled  a warrantless search. In this Tampa court, the trial judge ruled a Pat down search of a defendant was lawful. The Appeals panel ruled otherwise, finding the officers did not have reasonable suspicion that the defendant was armed with a dangerous weapon.

 

The defendant was walking along highway and did not comply with an officers’ requests to keep his hands out of his pockets. That fact alone was not sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion. The cops saw no weapons and did not notice bulges in the defendant’s clothing to indicate that he was carrying a weapon.  Motion to suppress firearm and drugs discovered during pat down should have been granted.

Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures


Case Excerpt: “This case presents the issue of two conflicting interests: the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures and the ongoing concern for officer safety in an increasingly dangerous profession. But even though the facts of this case reveal an alarming result of the pat-down—a gun—we are not permitted to be distracted by the fruit of the search. Instead, our focus must be on the justification for the search. See D.B.P. v. State, 31 So. 3d 883, 887 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (“The success of the search . . . is not now and never has been the test to be applied.”)”

. . .

“For a weapons pat-down search to be valid, an officer must identify objective facts indicating that the person detained is armed and dangerous. See Howell v. State, 725 So. 2d 429, 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). But here, the only justification provided by the officers was the fact that Dawson refused to comply with their requests to keep his hands out of his pockets. That fact—standing alone—was insufficient to establish reasonable suspicion. The comment made by one officer that he believed Dawson “could have contraband or a weapon” was simply unsupported by any identifiable objective facts to lead him to that conclusion. Because “routine patdown searches based on general concern for officer safety are not constitutionally permitted,” McNeil v. State, 995 So. 2d 525, 526 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), the officers lacked reasonable suspicion to conduct a pat-down search of Dawson and the trial court erred by denying the suppression motion.”

The Complete Pat Down Opinion is available for download here.

Source: 36 Fla. L. Weekly D804a

Jury Selection | Juror Questionnaires | Barry Bonds

Juror Questionaire, Jury Selection, Jurors

Juror Questionaire, Jury Selection, Jurors

Juror Questionnaires

Questions for Potential Jurors


“jury decision should be based upon the evidence in court, trial lawyers want to know if prospective jurors have been following a case in the media”


Defense Attorneys who go to trial would like to know more about those who are seated on a jury in their client’s trials. In a jury trial dozens of people are called by the court and interviewed by the lawyers and in some case, by the judge. Some trial courts allow for written questions to be answered by potential jurors to aid in the selection process. I have spent some time reviewing a juror questionnaire in a high profile trial in federal court and listed a few questions below. Our readers can view a recent Federal Juror Questionnaire here. We have also posted a Juror Questionnaire used in an entertainment personality’s trial here.


Since a jury decision should be based upon the evidence in court, trial lawyers want to know if prospective jurors have been following a case in the media. Now that means television, radio, newspapers, and the internet.

31. How often do you use the Internet?
( ) Never ( ) A little ( ) Sometimes ( ) A lot ( ) Every day
What sort of things do you use the Internet for?
What sort of information do you obtain from the Internet?
Which web sites do you visit regularly?
32. Do you like to “blog” or read blogs on the Internet? ( ) Yes ( ) No
IF YES, which blogs do you visit?
33. Do write your own blog or post comments on other blogs? ( ) Yes ( ) No
IF YES, what is the name of your blog or what blogs do you post comments to?
47. Reports about this case have appeared in the news. Have you seen, heard or read anything about this case? (This includes not only anything you may have seen or read in the media, but also anything you might have heard from relatives, friends or coworkers.)
( ) Yes ( ) No
IF YES, please indicate where you heard or read about this case by checking all that apply:
( ) TV News ( ) Radio News ( ) Newspaper ( ) Magazines ( ) Books, including “Game of Shadows”( ) Internet ( ) On-Line ( ) Conversations ( ) Overheard others discussing the case
Will there be a Jury Selected in Your Case? Call for a Free Telephone Consultation 1-877-793-9290.

Spring Break High Tech Mobile Arrest | Florida Update

Cops and Businesses Monitor Visitors

Spring Break Update | Criminal Defense Expert,  notes that some police agencies are employing mobile 3G and WiFi ID Card Scanners,  and a non-discretionary “zero tolerance” policy to encountering and arresting Spring Break visitors. Police are using fairly vague and discretionary charges, such as Disorderly Conduct Florida Statute 877.03. These seemingly minor charges can result in a permanent criminal record. See details about this charge below.

Also we note that one restaurant on a beach has over a dozen security cameras monitoring the activities of beach-goers. One media outlet predicted, “more than 2 million students will be on break.” BayNews9.com . With the foolishness of zero-tolerance policies we expect Florida Courts and jails to be packed. Casey frequently represents out-of-state visitors charged with offenses while on vacation.

For Help Call 1-877-793-9290

 

Security Cameras

One small Florida police department has even installed a couple of cameras mounted on utility poles to monitor beach visitors. Expect that law enforcement will also be using readily available portable card scanners that will retrieve age information from the back of Florida (and possibly other) state driver’s licenses.

Back of Florida License

According to official sources with the State of Florida, “The (Florida License and ID Cards) cards are created using a new, updated digital imaging process. This process stores all the information from the front of the card in a 2-D barcode and magnetic stripe located on the back (see photo to your left). Driver license class, restrictions, conditions, and endorsements specific to the driver are printed on the back.” DHSMV Official Site.

For Help Call 1-877-793-9290


Disorderly Conduct | Summary of Charge

Florida Statute: 877.03
Level: 2nd Degree Misdemeanor

Breach of the peace; disorderly conduct.

Whoever commits such acts as are of a nature to corrupt the public morals, or outrage the sense of public decency, or affect the peace and quiet of persons who may witness them, or engages in brawling or fighting, or engages in such conduct as to constitute a breach of the peace or disorderly conduct, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

For Help Call 1-877-793-9290

Underage Drinking | Open Container | Summary of the Charges

Many Florida Communities have very stringent Open Container Laws that prohibit possession of open containers away from licensed facilities (Bars) and particularly on some beaches. Below are details of one such ordinance.

Sample Open Container Ordinance

Tampa Open Container Ordinance Sec. 3-40. – Consumption and possession of open containers on streets, sidewalks, alleys and other public property.
(a)It is unlawful for any person to consume, assist or aid another to consume any alcoholic beverage upon any street, sidewalk, alley or other public property within the city.
(b)It is unlawful for any person to possess an open container of an alcoholic beverage upon any street, sidewalk, alley or other public property, including public or semi-public parking lots, within the city.
(1)As used in subsection (b), “open container” means any vessel or container containing an alcoholic beverage, including beer or wine, which is immediately capable of consumption or the seal of which has been broken.
(2)An open container shall be considered to be in the possession of the person if the container is in the physical control of such person.
(c)Subsections (a) and (b) do not apply when:
(1)The street, connecting sidewalk or alley has been officially temporarily closed upon application to the director of public works and the approval of the city council for the purpose of a block party as provided in this Code; or
(2)A portion of a sidewalk has been leased and permitted as a sidewalk café as provided for in chapter 22 of this Code; or
(3)Public property has been zoned and permitted for the sale of alcoholic beverages pursuant to law; or
(4)A portion of the street, connecting sidewalk or alley has been marked and/or designated as a crossing for a public golf course.
For Help Call 1-877-793-9290
Florida Underage Drinking Statute
562.111 Possession of alcoholic beverages by persons under age 21 prohibited.
(1) It is unlawful for any person under the age of 21 years, except a person employed under the provisions of s. 562.13 acting in the scope of her or his employment, to have in her or his possession alcoholic beverages, except that nothing contained in this subsection shall preclude the employment of any person 18 years of age or older in the sale, preparation, or service of alcoholic beverages in licensed premises in any establishment licensed by the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco or the Division of Hotels and Restaurants. Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 562.45, any person under the age of 21 who is convicted of a violation of this subsection is guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083; however, any person under the age of 21 who has been convicted of a violation of this subsection and who is thereafter convicted of a further violation of this subsection is, upon conviction of the further offense, guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(2) The prohibition in this section against the possession of alcoholic beverages does not apply to the tasting of alcoholic beverages by a student who is at least 18 years of age, who is tasting the alcoholic beverages as part of the student’s required curriculum at a postsecondary educational institution that is institutionally accredited by an agency recognized by the United States Department of Education and that is licensed or exempt from licensure pursuant to the provisions of chapter 1005 or is a public postsecondary education institution; if the student is enrolled in the college and is tasting the alcoholic beverages only for instructional purposes during classes that are part of such a curriculum; if the student is allowed only to taste, but not consume or imbibe, the alcoholic beverages; and if the alcoholic beverages at all times remain in the possession and control of authorized instructional personnel of the college who are 21 years of age or older.
(3) In addition to any other penalty imposed for a violation of subsection (1), the court shall direct the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to withhold issuance of, or suspend or revoke, the violator’s driver’s license or driving privilege, as provided in s. 322.056.
For Help Call 1-877-793-9290

Source: https://www.baynews9.com/article/news/2011/march/215091/Police-cracking-down-during-spring-break
https://www.flhsmv.gov/ddl/newformat.html

Video Tampa Prescription Drug Roundup | Breaking News

Operation Pain Reliever, Tampa Prescription Drug Defense Lawyer,  Oxycontin,

Operation Pain Reliever, Tampa Prescription Drug Defense Lawyer, Oxycontin,

Oxycontin

Oxycodone, morphine, methadone, amphetamines, hydrocodone, xanax, and other types of prescription medication legal  problems


Tampa Prescription Drug Defense Lawyer just received a report of yet another Prescription Drug roundup as HCSO Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Deputies deputies made 33 arrests for dealing prescription medications. Code Name: Operation Pain Reliever .


Former Drug Court Prosecutor W.F. “Casey” Ebsary, Jr. is now available to help both the accused and their family members with all types of drug charges. Casey can help with oxycodone, morphine, methadone, amphetamines, hydrocodone, xanax, and other types of prescription medication legal  problems.

Need Relief? Call me Toll Free 1-877-793-9290.





Source: https://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/crime/as-bondi-announces-crackdown-on-prescription-meds-33-arrested-in/1149356


Hillsborough Prescription Drug Busts | Operation Pain Reliever | Prescription Drug Defense Lawyer

Tampa Police Arrest 2011 Gasparilla Video

Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney / Lawyer, Casey Ebsary, found this internet Video produced by the Tampa Police Department. We have been working through the night helping those who were charged at this year’s Gasparilla Pirate Fest in Tampa, Florida  near Bayshore Boulevard..

Call Me Toll Free at 1-877-793-9290.

Gasparilla Arrest Video, Tampa Police, Open Container, Possession of Alcohol

Gasparilla Arrest Report Update | 359 Arrests

Gasparilla Arrest Report Update: “Tampa police reported 349 arrests, most for alcohol violations and all but three misdemeanors. The felonies were charges for grand theft auto, resisting arrest with violence and battery on a law enforcement officer. Hillsborough County deputies made an additional 10 arrests on disorderly conduct or open container charges.” 


Original Report Gasparilla Arrest; 222 Arrests


Source: https://www.tampabay.com/news/bigger-crowds-fewer-arrests-and-a-continuing-clamor-for-beads-mark/1148560

Gasparilla Arrest | Notice to Appear | Affordable Help From Attorney | Lawyer

Gasparilla Arrest? Notice to Appear? Get Affordable Help From an Attorney | Lawyer | Toll Free 1-877-793-9290

 

One recent Gasparilla, there were 5 BUI Boating Under the Influence Arrests. The Police, Sheriff’s Office, Coast Guard, and Florida Fish and Wildlife will be using a Mobile Facility this year to process arrests made on the water. See video at bottom of this article. Many of these charges listed below are criminal charges that can result in a permanent criminal record

Common Charges From The Gasparilla Weekend.

Possession Open Container

If you have been charged with TPOR0064 POSSESSION OF OPEN CONTAINER you can call a Defense Attorney Tampa at 1-877-793-9290 and tell me your story.

Form Code: TPOR0064
City of Tampa Municipal Code: 003.40.B
Level: Municipal/Local
Description: POSSESSION OF OPEN CONTAINER

TPOR0064 POSSESSION OF OPEN CONTAINER one of the most commonly charged offenses in Hillsborough County, Florida.

Sec. 3-40. – Consumption and possession of open containers on streets, sidewalks, alleys and other public property.

(b) It is unlawful for any person to possess an open container of an alcoholic beverage upon any street, sidewalk, alley or other public property, including public or semi-public parking lots, within the city.

(1) As used in subsection (b), “open container” means any vessel or container containing an alcoholic beverage, including beer or wine, which is immediately capable of consumption or the seal of which has been broken.

(2) An open container shall be considered to be in the possession of the person if the container is in the physical control of such person.

 

Tampa Open Container Ordinance Sec. 3-40. – Consumption and possession of open containers on streets, sidewalks, alleys and other public property.
 
(a)It is unlawful for any person to consume, assist or aid another to consume any alcoholic beverage upon any street, sidewalk, alley or other public property within the city.
 
(b)It is unlawful for any person to possess an open container of an alcoholic beverage upon any street, sidewalk, alley or other public property, including public or semi-public parking lots, within the city.
 
(1)As used in subsection (b), “open container” means any vessel or container containing an alcoholic beverage, including beer or wine, which is immediately capable of consumption or the seal of which has been broken.
 
(2)An open container shall be considered to be in the possession of the person if the container is in the physical control of such person.
 
(c)Subsections (a) and (b) do not apply when:
 
(1)The street, connecting sidewalk or alley has been officially temporarily closed upon application to the director of public works and the approval of the city council for the purpose of a block party as provided in this Code; or
 
(2)A portion of a sidewalk has been leased and permitted as a sidewalk café as provided for in chapter 22 of this Code; or
 
(3)Public property has been zoned and permitted for the sale of alcoholic beverages pursuant to law; or
 
(4)A portion of the street, connecting sidewalk or alley has been marked and/or designated as a crossing for a public golf course.
 
(Ord. No. 99-229, § 1, 10-28-99; Ord. No. 2007-19, § 2, 2-1-07)

 

MISC0112 POSSESSION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE BY PERSON UND

 

Possess Alcohol Under 21 
If you have been charged with MISC0112 POSSESSION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE BY PERSON UND you can call a Tampa Criminal Defense Lawyer at 1-877-793-9290 and tell me your story.
 
MISC0112 POSSESSION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE BY PERSON UND is often charged in Hillsborough County, Florida.
 

Title XXXIV ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO
Chapter 562 BEVERAGE LAW: ENFORCEMENT

562.111 Possession of alcoholic beverages by persons under age 21 prohibited.

(1) It is unlawful for any person under the age of 21 years, except a person employed under the provisions of s. 562.13 acting in the scope of her or his employment, to have in her or his possession alcoholic beverages, except that nothing contained in this subsection shall preclude the employment of any person 18 years of age or older in the sale, preparation, or service of alcoholic beverages in licensed premises in any establishment licensed by the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco or the Division of Hotels and Restaurants. Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 562.45, any person under the age of 21 who is convicted of a violation of this subsection is guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083; however, any person under the age of 21 who has been convicted of a violation of this subsection and who is thereafter convicted of a further violation of this subsection is, upon conviction of the further offense, guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

(2) The prohibition in this section against the possession of alcoholic beverages does not apply to the tasting of alcoholic beverages by a student who is at least 18 years of age, who is tasting the alcoholic beverages as part of the student’s required curriculum at a postsecondary educational institution that is institutionally accredited by an agency recognized by the United States Department of Education and that is licensed or exempt from licensure pursuant to the provisions of chapter 1005 or is a public postsecondary education institution; if the student is enrolled in the college and is tasting the alcoholic beverages only for instructional purposes during classes that are part of such a curriculum; if the student is allowed only to taste, but not consume or imbibe, the alcoholic beverages; and if the alcoholic beverages at all times remain in the possession and control of authorized instructional personnel of the college who are 21 years of age or older.

(3) In addition to any other penalty imposed for a violation of subsection (1), the court shall direct the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles to withhold issuance of, or suspend or revoke, the violator’s driver’s license or driving privilege, as provided in s. 322.056.

Common Charges From The Gasparilla Weekend.

DUI Driving Under Influence

If you have been charged with TRAF1012 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE You can call a Tampa Criminal Defense Lawyer at 1-877-793-9290 and tell me your story.

Form Code: TRAF1012

Florida Statute: 316.193.1
Level: Misd (Misdemeanor)
Degree: 2nd

Description: DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE

Title XXIII MOTOR VEHICLES
Chapter 316 STATE UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL

316.193 Driving under the influence; penalties.

(1) A person is guilty of the offense of driving under the influence and is subject to punishment as provided in subsection (2) if the person is driving or in actual physical control of a vehicle within this state and:

(a) The person is under the influence of alcoholic beverages, any chemical substance set forth in s. 877.111, or any substance controlled under chapter 893, when affected to the extent that the person’s normal faculties are impaired;

(b) The person has a blood-alcohol level of 0.08 or more grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood; or

(c) The person has a breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or more grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath.

Common Charges From The Gasparilla Weekend.

DUI Over .08

If you have been charged with TRAF1015 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE UNLAWFUL BREATH A (DUI determined with a Breathalyzer Intoxilyzer Machine) you can call a Tampa DUI Lawyer at 1-877-793-9290 and tell me your story.

Form Code: TRAF1015
Florida Statute: 316.193.1C
Level: Misd (Misdemeanor)
Degree: 2nd
Description: DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE  UNLAWFUL BREATH A (DUI determined with a Breathalyzer Machine)

TRAF1015 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE  UNLAWFUL BREATH A (DUI determined with a Breathalyzer / Intoxilyzer Machine) one of the most commonly charged offenses in Hillsborough County, Florida.

 

Title XXIII MOTOR VEHICLES
Chapter 316 STATE UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL

316.193 Driving under the influence; penalties.

(1) A person is guilty of the offense of driving under the influence and is subject to punishment as provided in subsection (2) if the person is driving or in actual physical control of a vehicle within this state and:

(a) The person is under the influence of alcoholic beverages, any chemical substance set forth in s. 877.111, or any substance controlled under chapter 893, when affected to the extent that the person’s normal faculties are impaired;

(b) The person has a blood-alcohol level of 0.08 or more grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood; or

(c) The person has a breath-alcohol level of 0.08 or more grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath.

Police Will Also Be on the Lookout For:

Open Containers Permitted Only Along The Parade Route – In Designated Areas
 
Must Be 21 Or Older To Consume Alcohol
 
Alcohol May Not Be Consumed From Kegs Or Large Vessels
 
No Glass Permitted
 
Use Port-O-Lets Or Other Restroom Facilities
 
No Fighting
 
No Trespassing On Private Property 
 
No Flashing Or Nudity For Beads


Common Charges From The Gasparilla Weekend.

Notice to Appear? Tell Me Your Story Toll Free 1-877-793-9290 .


Chapter 901 ARRESTS

901.28 Notice to appear for misdemeanors or violations of municipal or county ordinances; effect on authority to conduct search. — The issuance of a notice to appear shall not be construed to affect a law enforcement officer’s authority to conduct an otherwise lawful search, as provided by law.

 

901.31 Failure to obey written promise to appear.—Any person who willfully fails to appear before any court or judicial officer as required by a written notice to appear shall be fined not more than the fine of the principal charge or imprisoned up to the maximum sentence of imprisonment of the principal charge, or both, regardless of the disposition of the charge upon which the person was originally arrested. Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the court from exercising its power to punish for contempt.

 

BUI Video 


Gasparilla Arrest? Get Affordable Help From an Attorney | Lawyer | Toll Free 1-877-793-9290

Criminal Forfeiture Update | Innocent Owner Defense | Third Party Claim

Criminal Forfeiture Update | Innocent Owner Defense | Third Party Claim

Criminal Forfeiture | Innocent Owner Defense

Third Party Claim | Innocent Owner
Criminal Forfeiture Standard (A District Magistrate’s View)
18 U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C), 982(a)(5), and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) provide in pertinent part that any property, real or personal, which constitutes, or is derived from proceeds traceable to the charged offenses in this case are subject to forfeiture by the United States. For the property to be subject to forfeiture, the Government must establish the requisite nexus between the offense and the property. FED. R. CRIM. P. 32(2)(b)(1).”
“Any third party asserting a legal interest in such property must petition the Court for a hearing to adjudicate her interest in the property. 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) (2). Rule 32.2(c)(1) provides that a Court must hold an ancillary proceeding if a third party files a petition asserting an interest in the property. FED. R. CRIM. P. 32.2(c)(1). The Federal Rules of Evidence apply to the ancillary proceeding. FED. R. CRIM. P. 32.2 (Advisory Committee Notes 2000). Section 853(n)(5) sets out the following procedure for the hearing:”
“At the hearing, the petitioner may testify and present evidence and witnesses on his own behalf, and cross-examine witnesses who appear at the hearing. The United States may present evidence . . . . In addition to testimony and evidence shall consider the relevant portions of the record of the criminal case which resulted in the order of forfeiture. 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(5)(emphasis added).”
“The Court shall amend the order of forfeiture if the claimant establishes by a preponderance of the evidence either that: (A) the petitioner has a legal right, title, or interest in the property, and such right, title, or interest renders the order of forfeiture invalid in whole or in part because the right, title, or interest was vested in the petitioner rather than the defendant or was superior to any right, title, or interest of the defendant at the time of the commission of the acts which gave rise to the forfeiture of the property under this section; or (B) the petitioner is a bona fide purchaser for value of the right, title, or interest in the property and was at the time of purchase reasonably without cause to believe that the property was subject to forfeiture under this section ….21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6)(emphasis added).”
“To prevail on a third-party claim under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6)(A), a petitioner must show that she had a legal interest in the property and the interest vested in the claimant instead of the defendant. See 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6)(A). However, “[a] third-party claimant … must have more than bare legal title to the forfeited property.” United States v. Hovind, No. 3:06cr83/MCR, 2009 WL 2369340, at *4 (N.D. Fla. July 29, 2009). In the Eleventh Circuit, possession of bare legal title without the right to exercise dominion and control over the property is insufficient to prove ownership. See A Single Family Residence Located at 900 Rio Vista Blvd., 803 F.2d 625, 630 (11th Cir. 1986).”
Source: Case 8:09-cr-00110-JDW-AEP January 28, 2011
Innocent Owner in a Criminal Forfeiture Case? Call Me Toll Free 1-877-793-9290.

Restitution for Victims of Child Pornography

Restitution for Victims of Child Pornography

Tampa Criminal Defense expert notes and has posted this Motion for Restitution on behalf of Victims of Child Porn. This emerging area of litigation has achieved different results in various jurisdictions. Here is a free copy of an action filed in Federal Court seeking Restitution for Victims of Child Pornography.

“The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, and the Violence Against Women Act of 1994  were the first statutes to expressly make restitution mandatory for a few specified offenses, including sexual abuse, sexual exploitation, and domestic violence. Section 2259, the “mandatory” restitution statute applicable to the offenses of conviction in this case,  provides that “the court shall order restitution for any offense” in Chapter 110 of the United States Code titled “Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children.” 18 U.S.C. §§ 2259(a), (b)(4) (emphasis added).” (footnotes omitted).


As previously reported, In
Tampa last year, 2009, the Government and Probation agreed that, in a possession of child pornography case, restitution for Vicky was not appropriate “because the harm to the victim was not proximately caused by the defendant.”  That case is U.S. v. XXX, Case No. 8:09-cr-00189-T-27MAP. (Name omitted).
 
If you have issues or questions about this sweeping federal law, call me toll free at 1-877-793-9290.
Source: Senior Criminal Defense Attorney in the Middle District of Florida and Pacer Federal Court Database
 
Child Porn Attorney Lawyer